尤其新踏入這個領域,還對什麼事都懵懵懂懂時...
看了動物行為學界的先驅也這麼說,更加篤定自己作得沒錯!
非常喜愛這篇文章! 也推薦您看!
Abrantes or Dunbar(伊恩唐拔博士), who's the best?(文章內容分享)
http://www.dogstardaily.com/blogs/abrantes-or-dunbar%E2%80%94who%E2%80%99s-best
每個所謂的"專家",都有自己的一套.
也許A說的,和B說的是衝突的~
那你要照誰說的作呢?
今天不管你學了什麼,或別人教了你什麼,
你要問你自己:
"什麼樣的方式對你的狗最好?
你希望他是一隻什麼樣的狗?
你希望他過得是什麼樣的生活?"
將這段話與各位分享,
是希望各位家長不管接收到任何資訊前,
請記得一定要自己消化過.思考過...
然後選擇最好,也最適合你和你們家寶貝的~
千萬不要看到什麼,就照單全收哦~@@"
2017年補充:
這個觀念也是上Turid Rugaas IDTE Taiwan訓練師課程時,
阿嬤不斷提醒我們的事!
這是個資訊爆炸的時代,
資訊太多! 資訊更新的速度很快!
尤其動物行為是新領域,
科學家們也在試著了解、探究各種動物行為背後的意義!
如果你不懂得消化資訊、不懂得與時更新資訊,
那麼,"盡信書,不如無書"!
版權所有! 未經授權,禁止轉載!
---------------
下面的內容為轉貼Vicki Huang摘取部份內文的翻譯內容
https://www.facebook.com/VickiCT.TW/posts/258955547570429
"Roger Abrantes博士在一篇部落格文章:Abrantes or Dunbar, who's the best (http://www.dogstardaily.com/blogs/abrantes-or-dunbar%E2%80%94who%E2%80%99s-best) 解答一位女子的問題,有兩段文章我覺得特別好,在接觸到各種不同理念和技巧後,我們都必須思考自己的選擇:
「如果你有耐性也很勤勞努力,肯花時間深入研讀行為及學習原則,並且獲得所需的經驗,你將成為好的訓練師。你要能夠接受不同想法同時也保持批判,這不是易事。不要只因你不喜歡某個理論就置之不理,不要只因某個理論顯然符合你自己眼前的目標就接納它。不要只因為你喜歡某人就贊成他的觀點,不要只因你不喜歡某人就反對他的觀點,然後,你將成為好的訓練師....而且你將成為不同於我或伊恩的訓練師,因為你將獨樹一格。」
「...不過,你必須謹慎明智,某個方法不一定需要比另一個方法好或不好,這與你想談到多少細節有關,而且終歸於你是什麼樣的人有關。有很多方法可達成相同目的,看看人生,生活的方式如此之多,生命的形式如此之多,然而同一個目的是,儘可能活得久而且最好把你的基因傳給下一代。伊恩的方法就某個層面來看很 棒,而我希望我的方法從另一層面來看也很棒。我喜歡把它們想成互補關係。終歸來說,這些其實都不重要。愛因斯坦並沒有證實牛頓錯了,他們都是對的,全取決於你從哪個層次的事實來看。」"
Quoted from Roger Abrantes' blog articles:
.............................
“You’ll become a good trainer if you’re patient and diligent, if you take the time to study behavior and the principles of learning in depth and get the necessary experience. You must be open-minded and critical
at the same time, not an easy task. Don’t discard a theory just because you don’t like it, and don’t accept another just because it apparently suits your own immediate goals. Don’t approve of an argument just because you like the person who uses it; and don’t reject one because you don’t like the person behind it. Then, you’ll become a good trainer and you know what?” I asked, pausing for effect.
“No, please tell me!” she pleaded.
“And you’ll be a different trainer, different from Dunbar and Abrantes because you’ll be your own.”
“Wow,” she cried out, “I hope you’re right!”
“I am, but you must be careful and wise. One method does not necessarily need to be better or worse than any other. It all comes down to what level of detail you want to go into and, in the end, what kind
of person you are. There are many ways to do the same. Look at life, so many ways to live, so many life forms and yet the same goal, to live as long as possible and preferably pass your genes to the next generation. Ian’s way is great on one level and mine, hopefully, on another. I like to think they supplement or complement one another. Ultimately, it doesn’t really matter.” I said and added with a sheepish smile,
“Einstein didn’t prove that Newton was wrong. They are both right. It all depends on what level of reality you’re looking at.”